• 实时天气:多伦多 20°
    温度感觉: 20°
  • 实时天气:温哥华 10°
    温度感觉: 10°
  • 实时天气:卡加利
    温度感觉:
  • 实时天气:蒙特利尔 20°
    温度感觉: 20°
  • 实时天气:温尼伯 20°
    温度感觉: 21°
楼主: 谷雨---135
打印 上一主题 下一主题

奇才奇评:竟然敢起义?!

 
46#
发表于 2010-4-14 15:22:51 | 只看该作者
你搞错了,人家是书记,不是恶霸。
三伏 发表于 2010-4-14 16:17

没错,恶霸兼书记。
回复

使用道具 举报

47#
发表于 2010-4-14 15:27:21 | 只看该作者
没错,恶霸兼书记。
dlstbwzg007 发表于 2010-4-14 16:22


基本正确, 只是顺序上要调整一下: 书记兼恶霸; 因为他先当的书记, 再干的恶霸.
回复

使用道具 举报

48#
发表于 2010-4-14 15:40:02 | 只看该作者
上哪赚狗粮?这得问你们啦。
回国到民间走走,看到的是日新月异、欣欣向荣。
虽然百姓也有不满发发牢骚的,但主流是对中国前景乐观。
只有赚狗粮才是整天骂中国。
dlstbwzg007 发表于 2010-4-14 13:27


老毛告诫你:

上边放的屁不全是香的,这里也有对立,有香也有臭,一定要嗅一嗅。【在省、市委书记会议上的插话(1957年1月)【...思想万岁】一九六九年八月版) -
回复

使用道具 举报

49#
发表于 2010-4-15 22:49:58 | 只看该作者
基本正确, 只是顺序上要调整一下: 书记兼恶霸; 因为他先当的书记, 再干的恶霸.
中 加 关 系 发表于 2010-4-14 16:27


:yes:
回复

使用道具 举报

50#
发表于 2010-4-16 12:22:30 | 只看该作者
这就是被某些倾向共产党的人轻描淡写说的"虽然百姓也有不满发发牢骚的"? 这是鲜血!
中 加 关 系 发表于 2010-4-14 13:57 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif

打得头破血流算什么。前安省司法部长故意开车弄死一骑自行车的人,没看见你放个屁啊!
回复

使用道具 举报

51#
发表于 2010-4-16 12:56:56 | 只看该作者
That was just a traffic accident. Nobody proves he is intentional. Don't mislead people.

打得头破血流算什么。前安省司法部长故意开车弄死一骑自行车的人,没看见你放个屁啊!
aaazzz 发表于 2010-4-16 13:22
回复

使用道具 举报

52#
发表于 2010-4-16 13:33:52 | 只看该作者
That was just a traffic accident. Nobody proves he is intentional. Don't mislead people.
weinberger 发表于 2010-4-16 13:56 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif

中加关系说“被某些倾向共产党的人轻描淡写”。而你是“倾向民猪政府的人轻描淡写”的把“前安省司法部长故意开车弄死一骑自行车的人”说成交通事故。他先和骑自行车的人吵架;后来高速拖人致死;录像都清清楚楚的记录下来了。当然民猪的法律也是为当官的服务的。最后也和你说的一样轻判了事。要是一小屁民猪,你看会怎么判你。
回复

使用道具 举报

53#
发表于 2010-4-16 13:50:43 | 只看该作者
That was just a traffic accident. Nobody proves he is intentional. Don't mislead people.
weinberger 发表于 2010-4-16 11:56


Whether that was an accident in the eyes of the Canadian law remains to be seen. If I were you, I would not draw any conclusion yet. But from all indications (I was in Toronto when that happened last year so it stuck in my mind), Michael Bryant drove aggresively before that "accident" as well. The truth of the matter is one of the parties involved is now dead.
回复

使用道具 举报

54#
发表于 2010-4-16 13:57:37 | 只看该作者
The video shows that it was the mad cyclist who beat him, and then grabed him by the neck which caused cyclist himself being dragged along with the car.
Were you there when the accident happened? Did you see with your eyes that the driver intentionally killed the cyclist? If so, I suggest you talk to the police. If not, what make you so sure that he is guilty?
This is a society governed by law, which means you need to assume a person innocent until you can prove him guilty in the court of law.  Just because a person is a government official, or rich does not automatically mean he is guilty. This is democratic Canada, not Mao's China. You are looking at the world through your colored glasses

中加关系说“被某些倾向共产党的人轻描淡写”。而你是“倾向民猪政府的人轻描淡写”的把“前安省司法部长故意开车弄死一骑自行车的人”说成交通事故。他先和骑自行车的人吵架;后来高速拖人致死;录像都清清楚楚的记录下来了。当然民猪的法律也是为当官的服务的。最后也和你说的一样轻判了事。要是一小屁民猪,你看会怎么判你。
aaazzz 发表于 2010-4-16 14:33
回复

使用道具 举报

55#
发表于 2010-4-16 14:03:15 | 只看该作者
I assume he is innocent before he is proven guilty, aaazzz assumes he is guilty before proven innocent

Whether that was an accident in the eyes of the Canadian law remains to be seen. If I were you, I would not draw any conclusion yet. But from all indications (I was in Toronto when that happened last year so it stuck in my mind), Michael Bryant drove aggresively before that "accident" as well. The truth of the matter is one of the parties involved is now dead.
香港来的鸟人 发表于 2010-4-16 14:50
回复

使用道具 举报

56#
发表于 2010-4-16 14:18:01 | 只看该作者
I assume he is innocent before he is proven guilty, aaazzz assumes he is guilty before proven innocent
weinberger 发表于 2010-4-16 13:03



In that case, maybe you should reword your statement thusly "That was quite possibly a traffic accident, he is innocent until proven guilty."

Your original statement was misleading as well. :aplain:
回复

使用道具 举报

57#
发表于 2010-4-16 14:39:24 | 只看该作者
The video shows that it was the mad cyclist who beat him, and then grabed him by the neck which caused cyclist himself being dragged along with the car.
Were you there when the accident happened? Did you see with your eyes that the driver intentionally killed the cyclist? If so, I suggest you talk to the police. If not, what make you so sure that he is guilty?
This is a society governed by law, which means you need to assume a person innocent until you can prove him guilty in the court of law.  Just because a person is a government official, or rich does not automatically mean he is guilty. This is democratic Canada, not Mao's China. You are looking at the world through your colored glasses
weinberger 发表于 2010-4-16 14:57 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif

中国也是法制国家。中加关系说的把人打的头破血流的官员也应该是“innocent before he is proven guilty”。而你们这些毒轮运们从来都是“assumes he is guilty before proven innocent“。中国是民主集中制的法制国家,not民猪的加拿大。You are looking at the 中国 through your colored glasses。
回复

使用道具 举报

58#
发表于 2010-4-17 09:39:17 | 只看该作者
樓上是弱智,
在火星被外星人研究剛返回地球,
對某和諧大國一無所知。
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 免费注册

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表